Sean Penn ymmärrä ei, ei Miksa delighted päästänyt Terrence Malick ACT! Lisa
Es muy important para Sean Penn, todo el mundo en busca de acción. Penn and tipsy ocasional increible siempre he estado autoestima intimately Ligado y cuando habla sobre el arte de Penn y actua mentalidad of the artist - and point hasta que se que Sinti ofendido really Chris Rock bromeó actua demasiado de Jude Law - lo que está es hablar really The important que es para él que usted es que dificile the bodies of trabajo, de un jugador que minor importance to the real example. Cuando todo para encaje Penn, que puedo rendimiento de energía primordial cases. Encantado de estar él que decirles a todos.
I was leading Penn tendono come Godere Clint Eastwood e Tim Robbins, ragazzo che gli Attori comprendere it processo e mettere a fuoco telecamere the semplicemente catturando the Penn ottima performance. (Reed is there regista è conosciuto come a mani-di fuori è troppo da Woody Allen Penn, non vuole tanto che Libertà.) Se ha in mente regista it qualcos'altro a semplice servizio che di portineria a Penn, da lo sforzo PRODURRE . No if Tratta del film: If Sean dice.
I have not found the display of this feeling of writing, which is the most beautiful I have ever read. A story clearer and more conventional would have helped the film without, in my opinion, diminish its beauty and its consequences. Honestly, I'm still trying to figure out what I'm doing here and what I should add in this context! In addition, Terry has never even managed to explain it to me clearly.
Thus, Penn is not content "The Tree of Life," Terrence Malick film the, where his character has no real story and therefore no possibility of Penn at Penn, the man. If you were confused about what Penn did in "The Tree of Life" and was Penn.
Richard Brody of The New Yorker, here at the Prime Minister été à remarquer the original entretien au Figaro, constitutes an argument fort que c'est précisément pourquoi Malick Haché tellement de performance de Penn et that type of obligation here a realizer comme Malick in a ses acteurs lors de son dissimilar. (C'est à saying Penn n'est pas exactement Pas Bien "trash" beaucoup de gens le film que ce matin say ..) the droit Brody, bien sûr, mais il est également intéressant de Noter: Nous sommes pas a will 100 pour cent sur de ce que fait la Penn et qu'il allait Ajouter ce dans ce Contexte non plus. Ce qui n'est pas de nous que l'esprit say, bien sûr. Mais nous sommes les spectateurs, et non pas the acteur. Nous s'est pas présent au théâtre it juste pour voir Sean Penn, par opposition à, disons Sean Penn.
Malick is now the next line of authority figures to rebel against Penn, Woody Allen, George W. Bush, the hand of the lord.
0 comments:
Post a Comment